Kevin Williamson (NRO) examines the District of Columbia's Obamacare regulators decision to designate smoking "a pre-existing condition".
http://www.nationalreview.com/articles/345153/smoking-preexisting-condition-kevin-d-williamson?pg=1
There are many ways to implement a bad idea. For
instance, Congress might have passed a law requiring that all U.S. insurance
companies no longer charge smokers more for their coverage. The state of
Connecticut might have passed a similar law. New York City might have passed
that law. But in each case, voters who saw that stupidity for what it is would
have somebody to vote against. Obamacare eliminates the option for democratic
response. Instead, it creates a body of political appointees immune from being held
accountable at the ballot box. And who are those appointees? In the case of
D.C., you will find few surprises: The SEIU has a man on the board, along with
a lot of time-serving political types, a fellow from the Brookings Institution,
a lobbyist, etc. Don’t like their boneheaded decisions? Too bad.
...The notion of
insuring a preexisting condition is an oxymoron; insurance is by nature
concerned with that which may happen in the future rather than with that which
already has happened. In very large groups, human health outcomes are
predictable with a fair degree of precision: Given 10 million people, actuaries
can make pretty accurate predictions about how many people are going to get
lung cancer and how many are going to be in car accidents. Some factors are
relevant to some conditions: Being 17 years old and getting in a car accident,
for example, or smoking and heart disease, emphysema, cancer, etc. Insurance,
which places a price on calculated risks, will take some of those factors into
account. But you cannot in any meaningful sense insure somebody against cancer
when they already have cancer.
No comments:
Post a Comment